LONDON (AP) — Prince Harry’s fight for police protection in the U.K. received another setback on Monday, when a judge rejected his request to appeal an earlier ruling upholding a government panel’s decision to limit his access to publicly funded security after giving up his status as a working member of the royal family.
The long-running legal battle began more than four years ago when Harry challenged the panel’s decision, arguing that he and his family still needed an armed security detail because of hostility directed toward him and his wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, on social media and relentless hounding by the news media.
But High Court Judge Peter Lane ruled in February that the panel’s decision, which provides for “bespoke” security on an as-needed basis, wasn’t unlawful, irrational or unjustified.
“Insofar as the case-by-case approach may otherwise have caused difficulties, they have not been shown to be such as to overcome the high hurdle so as to render the decision-making irrational,” Lane wrote in his 51-page ruling.
Related articles:
Related suggestion:
Innovative farming fuels efficiency for 'new farmers' in E China's Jiangxi2 dead, 3 missing as ship hits bridge in south ChinaWondrous Xinjiang: Project renovating old residences revitalizes ancient cityTibetan herdersFarmers busy with harvesting, processing spring tea in SW China's GuizhouPeople fight desertification in Ningxia, NW ChinaInnovative farming fuels efficiency for 'new farmers' in E China's JiangxiNew productive forces play key role in growthSudan: Aid groups warn of mass death from hungerKendall Jenner keeps a low
3.1622s , 6491.0859375 kb
Copyright © 2024 Powered by Prince Harry in legal setback about security protection in UK ,Global Glimmer news portal